Design of Detection Systems

Fire detection and alarm systems are recognized as key features of a building’s fire prevention and protection strategy. This chapter presents a systematic technique to be used by fire protection engineers in the design and analysis of detection and alarm systems. The majority of discussion is directed toward systems used in buildings. However, many of the techniques and procedures also apply to systems used to protect planes, ships, outside storage yards, and other nonbuilding environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 844.23 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 1,054.99 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Detection and Alarm

Chapter © 2022

Insight into Smart Fire Detection Systems

Chapter © 2021

Minimization of Risk by the Controlled Replacement of Fire Detectors

Article 04 May 2023

References

  1. C. Mulliss and W. Lee, “On the Standard Rounding Rule for Multiplication and Division,” Chinese Journal of Physics, 36, 3, pp. 479–487 (1998). Google Scholar
  2. W. Lee, C. Mulliss, and H.-C. Chiu, “On the Standard Rounding Rule for Addition and Subtraction,” Chinese Journal of Physics, 38, 1, pp. 36–41 (2000). Google Scholar
  3. R. Custer, “Selection and Specification of the ‘Design Fire’ for Performance-Based Fire Protection Design,” in Proceedings, SFPE Engineering Seminar, Phoenix, AZ, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston (1993). Google Scholar
  4. R. Custer, B. Meacham, and C. Wood, “Performance-Based Design Techniques for Detection and Special Suppression Applications,” in Proceedings of the SFPE Engineering Seminars on Advances in Detection and Suppression Technology, San Francisco, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston (1994). Google Scholar
  5. SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2000). Google Scholar
  6. R. Custer and R. Bright, “Fire Detection: The State-of-the-Art,” NBS Tech. Note 839, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1974). Google Scholar
  7. UL 521, Standard for Safety Heat Detectors for Fire Protective Signaling Systems, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL (1993). Google Scholar
  8. NFPA 72®, National Fire Alarm Code®, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2007). Google Scholar
  9. G. Heskestad and H. Smith, FMRC Serial Number 22485, Factory Mutual Research Corp., Norwood, MA (1976). Google Scholar
  10. J.P. Hollman, Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York (1976). Google Scholar
  11. W. Bissell, “An Investigation into the Use of the Factory Mutual Plunge Tunnel and the Resulting RTI for Fixed Temperature Fire Detectors,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA (1988). Google Scholar
  12. M. Kokkala, “Thermal Properties of Heat Detectors and Sprinklers,” Nordtest Brand Symposium, Boras, Sweden (1986). Google Scholar
  13. R.P. Schifiliti and W.E. Pucci, “Fire Detection Modeling: State of the Art,” The Fire Detection Institute, Bloomfield, CT (1996). Google Scholar
  14. “Discussion of a New Principle in Fire Detection, Rate Compensation,” Fenwal, Inc., Ashland, MA (1951). Google Scholar
  15. C. E. Marrion, “Lag Time Modeling and Effects of Ceiling Jet Velocity on the Placement of Optical Smoke Detectors,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Center for Firesafety Studies, Worcester, MA (1989). Google Scholar
  16. R. Alpert, Fire Technology, 8, p. 3 (1972). Google Scholar
  17. L.Y. Cooper, “Interaction of an Isolated Sprinkler and a Two Layer Compartment Fire Environment,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1991). BookGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Delichatsios and R. L. Alpert, “Calculated Interaction of Water Droplet Sprays with Fire Plumes in Compartments,” NBS-GCR 86-520, Center for Fire Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1986). Google Scholar
  19. G. Heskestad, “Sprinkler/Hot Layer Interaction,” NIST-GCR 91-590, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1991). Google Scholar
  20. D.D. Evans and D.W. Stroup, “Methods to Calculate the Response Time of Heat and Smoke Detectors Installed Below Large Unobstructed Ceilings,” NBSIR 85-3167, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD (1985). Google Scholar
  21. G. Heskestad and M.A. Delichatsios, “The Initial Convective Flow in Fire,” 17th Symposium on Combustion, Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1978). Google Scholar
  22. G. Heskestad and M.A. Delichatsios, “Environments of Fire Detectors—Phase I: Effect of Fire Size, Ceiling Height, and Material,” Volume I: “Measurements” (NBS-GCR-77-86), (1977), Volume II: “Analysis” (NBS-GCR-77-95), National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA (1977). Google Scholar
  23. R.P. Schifiliti, “Use of Fire Plume Theory in the Design and Analysis of Fire Detector and Sprinkler Response,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Center for Firesafety Studies, Worcester, MA (1986). Google Scholar
  24. D.W. Stroup, D.D. Evans, and P. Martin, NBS Special Publication 712, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD (1986). Google Scholar
  25. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (1988 and 1995). Google Scholar
  26. NFPA 72®, National Fire Alarm Code®, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1984 through 1996 editions. Google Scholar
  27. G. Heskestad and M. Delichatsios, “Update: The Initial Convective Flow in Fire,” Fire Safety Journal, 15, pp. 471–475 (1989). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. C. Beyler, personal communication (1985). Google Scholar
  29. C. Beyler, “A Design Method for Flaming Fire Detection,” Fire Technology, 20, 4, pp. 9–16 (1984). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. J.R. Lawson, W.D. Walton, and W.H. Twilley, NBSIR 83-2787, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1983). Google Scholar
  31. B.J. Meacham, “Characterization of Smoke from Burning Materials for the Evaluation of Light Scattering-Type Smoke Detector Response,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Center for Firesafety Studies, Worcester, MA (1991). Google Scholar
  32. B.J. Meacham and V. Motevalli, “Characterization of Smoke from Smoldering Combustion for the Evaluation of Light Scattering-Type Smoke Detector Response,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, SFPE, 4, 1, p. 17 (1992). Google Scholar
  33. UL 268, Standard for Safety Smoke Detectors for Fire Protective Signaling Systems, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, IL (1989). Google Scholar
  34. G. Mulholland, “Smoke Production and Properties,” SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 4th ed., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, (2008). Google Scholar
  35. J. Geiman and D.T. Gottuk, “Alarm Thresholds for Smoke Detector Modeling,” Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, Worcester, MA, pp. 197–208 (2003). Google Scholar
  36. D.T. Gottuk, S.A. Hill, C.F. Schemel, B.D. Strehlen, S.L. Rose-Phersson, R.E. Shaffer, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Identification of Fire Signatures for Shipboard Multicriteria Fire Detection Systems,” Naval Research Laboratory, Memorandum Report, 6180-99-8386, Washington, DC, June 18, 1999. Google Scholar
  37. H.W. Carhart, T.A. Toomey, and F.W. Williams, “The Ex-USS SHADWELL Full-Scale Fire Research and Test Ship,” NRL Memorandum Report 6074, revised January 20, 1988, reissued 1992. Google Scholar
  38. M.J. Spearpoint and J.N. Smithies, “Practical Comparison of Domestic Smoke Alarm Sensitivity Standards,” Fire Research Station, Home Office Fire Research and Development Group, FRDG Publication No. 4.97 (1997). Google Scholar
  39. R.W. Bukowski, T.E. Waterman, and W.J. Christian, “Detector Sensitivity and Siting Requirements for Dwellings,” Final Technical Report, IITRI Project J6340, Contract No. 4-36092, NBS-GCR-75-51, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD (1975). Google Scholar
  40. UL 217, Standards for Single and Multiple Station Smoke Alarms, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL (1999). Google Scholar
  41. UL 268, Standard for Smkie Detectors for Fire Protective Signaling Systems, Northbrook, IL (1996). Google Scholar
  42. J. Hoseman, “Uber Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Korngrossenverteilung Hokkonzentrierter Polydispersionen von MiePartikeln,” Ph.D. Thesis, Aachen, Germany (1970). Google Scholar
  43. C.D. Litton, “A Mathematical Model for Ionization Type Smoke Detectors and the Reduced Source Approximation,” Fire Technology, 13, 4, pp. 266–281 (1977). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. R.W. Bukowski and G.W. Mulholland, “Smoke Detector Design and Smoke Properties,” TN 973, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1978). Google Scholar
  45. C. Helsper, H. Fissan, J. Muggli, and A. Scheidweiler, “Verification of Ionization Chamber Theory,” Fire Technology, 19, 1, p. 14 (1983). Google Scholar
  46. J. Newman, “Modified Theory for the Characterization of Ionization Smoke Detectors,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, Ottawa, Ontario (1994). Google Scholar
  47. G. Heskestad, “Generalized Characteristics of Smoke Entry and Response for Products-of-Combustion Detectors,” in Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Problems of Automatic Fire Detection, Rheinish-Westfalischen Technischen Hochschule, Aachen, Germany (1975). Google Scholar
  48. M. Kokkala et al., “Measurements of the Characteristic Lengths of Smoke Detectors,” Fire Technology, 28, 2, p. 99 (1992). Google Scholar
  49. J. Bjorkman, O. Huttunen, and M. Kokkala, “Paloilmaisimien toimintaa kuvaavat laskentamallit (Calculation Models for Fire Detector Response),” Research Notes 1036, Technical Research Center of Finland (1989). Google Scholar
  50. A. Oldweiler, “Investigation of the Smoke Detector L Number in the UL Smoke Box,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA (1995). Google Scholar
  51. M.A. Delichatsios, “Categorization of Cable Flammability, Detection of Smoldering, and Flaming Cable Fires,” Interim Report, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA (1980). Google Scholar
  52. NFPA 92B, Guide for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria, and Large Areas, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2005). Google Scholar
  53. G. Heskestad, FMRC Serial Number 21017, Factory Mutual Research Corp., Norwood, MA (1974). Google Scholar
  54. E.L. Brozovsky, “A Preliminary Approach to Siting Smoke Detectors Based on Design Fire Size and Detector Aerosol Entry Lag Time,” Master’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Center for Firesafety Studies, Worcester, MA (1991). Google Scholar
  55. S. Deal, “Technical Reference Guide for FPEtool Version 3.2,” NISTIR 5486, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1994). Google Scholar
  56. G. Heskestad and M.A. Delichatsios, “Environments of Fire Detectors, Phase I: Effects of Fire Size, Ceiling Heights, and Material,” Volume II, Analysis Technical Report Serial Number 11427, RC-T-11, Factory Mutual Research Corp., Norwood, MA (1977). Google Scholar
  57. K.B. Ginn, Architectural Acoustics, Bruel and Kjaer (1978). Google Scholar
  58. H. Butler, A. Bowyer, and J. Kew, “Locating Fire Alarm Sounders for Audibility,” Building Services Research and Information Association, Bracknell, UK (1981). Google Scholar
  59. E.H. Nober, H. Pierce, A. Well, and C.C. Johnson, NBS-GCR-83-284, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1980). Google Scholar
  60. M.J. Kahn, “Detection Times to Fire-Related Stimuli by Sleeping Subjects,” NBS-GCR-83-435, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1983). Google Scholar
  61. British Standard Code of Practice CP3, British Standards Institution, London (1972). Google Scholar
  62. C. Davis and D. Davis, Sound System Engineering, Howard H. Sams and Co., Inc., Indianapolis, IN (1975). Google Scholar
  63. Product Catalog, Fire Control Instruments, Newton, MA (1986). Google Scholar
  64. “Nomenclature and Definitions for Illuminating Engineering,” IES RP-16-1987, Illuminating Society of North America, New York (1987). Google Scholar
  65. K. Jacobs, Understanding Speech Intelligibility and the Fire Alarm Code, presented at the NFPA Congress, Anaheim, CA, copyright Bose corporation (2001). Google Scholar
  66. Accredited Standards Committee S3 (Bioacoustics), “Method for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech over Communications Systems,” ANSI S3.2, Acoustical Society of America, Melville, NY (1995). Google Scholar
  67. International Organization for Standardization, “Acoustics—The Construction and Calibration of Speech Intelligibility Tests,” ISO TR 4870, Geneva, Switzerland (1991). Google Scholar
  68. International Electrotechnical Commission, “Sound Systems for Emergency Purposes,” IEC 60849, 2nd ed., IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (1998). Google Scholar
  69. International Electrotechnical Commission, “Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index,” IEC-60268-16, 3rd ed., IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2003). Google Scholar
  70. J.P. Woycheese, “Speech Intelligibility Measurements in an Office Building,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 17, 4, pp. 245–269 (2007). ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. UL 1971, Standard for Safety Signaling Devices for the Hearing Impaired, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, IL (1992). Google Scholar
  72. A. Blondel, and J. Rey, “The perception of lights of short duration at their range limits”. Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 7, 625–662 (1912). Google Scholar
  73. J.D. Bullough, N.P. Skinner, and Y. Zhu, “Parameters for Indirect Viewing of Visual Signals Used in Emergency Notification” The Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, September 2013. Google Scholar

Further Readings